{"id":683,"date":"2018-04-12T16:24:07","date_gmt":"2018-04-12T15:24:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.testpneumatik.eu\/blog\/?p=683"},"modified":"2022-05-30T18:42:57","modified_gmt":"2022-05-30T18:42:57","slug":"nezavisly-test-pneumatik-tomket-co-mi-na-nem-prijde-zvlastni","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/nezavisly-test-pneumatik-tomket-co-mi-na-nem-prijde-zvlastni\/","title":{"rendered":"Nez\u00e1visl\u00fd test pneumatik Tomket – jak moc je v\u011brohodn\u00fd?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Spole\u010dnost Nejlevn\u011bj\u0161\u00edpneu.cz si nechala vytvo\u0159it nez\u00e1visl\u00fd test pneumatik Tomket<\/strong> ve dvou rozm\u011brech (205\/55 R16 a 225\/45 R17<\/em>) od spole\u010dnosti IDIADA, kter\u00e1 se testov\u00e1n\u00edm dlouhodob\u011b zab\u00fdv\u00e1. Na tom v z\u00e1sad\u011b nen\u00ed nic \u0161patn\u00e9ho, p\u0159eci jen je to lok\u00e1ln\u00ed produkt (i kdy\u017e ho nejlevn\u011bj\u0161\u00edpneu prod\u00e1vaj\u00ed i na dal\u0161\u00edch v\u00fdchodn\u00edch trz\u00edch) a \u0161anci dostat se do renomovan\u00fdch test\u016f m\u00e1 relativn\u011b malou, i kdy\u017e t\u0159eba do v\u00fdb\u011bru 50 dez\u00e9n\u016f od Autobildu by se asi dostat mohla. (Aktualizace 21.9. 2018: do v\u00fdb\u011bru se opravdu dostala<\/a>, i kdy\u017e tedy se zimn\u00edmi pneumatikami – obsadila 33. m\u00edsto z 50, pr\u00e9miov\u00fdm pneumatik\u00e1m tedy opravdu nekonkuruje<\/em>)<\/p>\n

Co je trochu zvl\u00e1\u0161tn\u00ed je to, \u017ee se nejedn\u00e1 o \u00fapln\u00fd “test” \u010di “benchmark”, jak jej Tomket prezentuje v r\u00e1diu a bannerech, ale pouh\u00e9 srovn\u00e1n\u00ed brzdn\u00e9 dr\u00e1hy<\/strong>, kter\u00e9 jak zn\u00e1me z test\u016f Autobild, poskytuj\u00ed jen velmi p\u0159ibli\u017en\u00fd odraz kvality pneumatiky – letos t\u0159eba Maxxis Premitra HP5 – 9 . m\u00edsto v brzdn\u00e9 dr\u00e1ze, ale 20. v celkov\u00e9m testu s ohodnocen\u00edm “podm\u00edn\u011bn\u011b doporu\u010deno” kv\u016fli vysok\u00e9mu opot\u0159eben\u00ed. Jinak \u0159e\u010deno – pneumatika je j\u00edzdn\u011b velmi dobr\u00e1 a je levn\u00e1, ale ve v\u00fdsledku se nevyplat\u00ed ji kupovat, proto\u017ee vydr\u017e\u00ed m\u00e9n\u011b ne\u017e konkurence<\/strong>. Samoz\u0159ejm\u011b nechci tvrdit, \u017ee je zrovna toto p\u0159\u00edpad Tomket\u016f, nicm\u00e9n\u011b by si to ur\u010dit\u011b zaslou\u017eilo vlastn\u00ed test.\u00a0 Takt\u00e9\u017e vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed, \u017ee “porazila pneumatiky renomovan\u00e9ho evropsk\u00e9ho v\u00fdrobce<\/em>” je lehce zav\u00e1d\u011bj\u00edc\u00ed, proto\u017ee si pod t\u00edmto ozna\u010den\u00edm asi m\u00e1lokdo p\u0159edstav\u00ed zna\u010dku Kleber<\/strong> <\/em>a v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b men\u0161\u00edho rozm\u011bru v\u00fdhru pouze brzd\u011bn\u00ed na mokru<\/em>, co\u017e je p\u0159esn\u011b p\u016flka testu, tedy sp\u00ed\u0161e rem\u00edza. Nav\u00edc Kleber stoj\u00ed prakticky stejn\u011b \u00a0jako testovan\u00e1 Tomket Sport 3\u00a0(1114K\u010d Tomket vs. 1105K\u010d Kleber)<\/em>, tak\u017ee v\u00fdsledek zas tak sv\u011btoborn\u00fd nen\u00ed. Nen\u00ed to \u00fapln\u011b f\u00e9r, ale dob\u0159e, v r\u00e1mci marketingu se ob\u010das takov\u00e9 p\u0159ikr\u00e1\u0161len\u00ed pravdy pou\u017e\u00edvaj\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Co je ale trochu zvl\u00e1\u0161tn\u00ed jsou informace o pneumatik\u00e1ch v testu. V\u0161echny pneumatiky zde maj\u00ed DOT k\u00f3dy spr\u00e1vn\u011b, k\u00f3d tov\u00e1rny tedy odpov\u00edd\u00e1 v\u00fdrobci dan\u00e9 pneumatiky. Pouze u Tomket\u016f je v prvn\u00edm p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b pou\u017eit k\u00f3d N4WC OF2X 5017<\/em>, kter\u00fd je zcela toto\u017en\u00fd jako v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b testovan\u00e9 Kleber HP3 Dynaxer<\/a>, co\u017e samoz\u0159ejm\u011b nen\u00ed spr\u00e1vn\u011b. Tento k\u00f3d odpov\u00edd\u00e1 tov\u00e1rn\u011b “Sc Victoria SA<\/em>” ve m\u011bst\u011b Floresti, kter\u00e1 n\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed Michelinu, jeho\u017e je Kleber sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed. V p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b prvn\u00edho testu tak DOT k\u00f3d jist\u011b spr\u00e1vn\u011b nen\u00ed.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Pokud by v r\u00e1mci druh\u00e9ho rozm\u011bru byl k\u00f3d spr\u00e1vn\u011b, asi bych to ne\u0159e\u0161il a p\u0159isoudil chybu lidsk\u00e9mu faktoru, nicm\u00e9n\u011b ani v r\u00e1mci druh\u00e9ho rozm\u011bru to spr\u00e1vn\u011b nen\u00ed. M\u00edsto standardn\u00edho form\u00e1tu DOT k\u00f3du, ve kter\u00e9m je t\u00fdden a rok v\u00fdroby a tov\u00e1rna je zde zvl\u00e1\u0161tnost ve tvaru “1OU F2DUHP<\/em>“. Datum v\u00fdroby zde tedy ur\u010dit\u011b nen\u00ed, zda je tam tov\u00e1rna, nev\u00edm – Tomket bohu\u017eel taj\u00ed, kde sv\u00e9 pneumatiky nech\u00e1v\u00e1 vyr\u00e1b\u011bt<\/strong>. Pokud by O m\u011bla b\u00fdt nula, tak snad asi Nankang<\/em>, ale to je pouze odhad, form\u00e1t je to opravdu divn\u00fd. Kde se pneumatiky Tomket vyr\u00e1b\u00ed jsme se zab\u00fdvali v samostatn\u00e9m \u010dl\u00e1nku<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Na d\u016fv\u011b\u0159e nep\u0159id\u00e1v\u00e1 ani sd\u011blen\u00ed “The results refer exclusively to the sample tested<\/em>“, co\u017e znamen\u00e1, \u017ee v\u00fdsledky se vztahuj\u00ed pouze k vzork\u016fm dodan\u00fdm k testov\u00e1n\u00edm. Vzhledem k tomu, \u017ee nap\u0159\u00edklad Nokian byl p\u0159isti\u017een, \u017ee do test\u016f d\u00e1v\u00e1 pneumatiky, kter\u00e9 nejsou ur\u010den\u00e9 k prodeji, ale vyrobeny pouze za \u00fa\u010delem testov\u00e1n\u00ed (= testovan\u00e1 pneumatika by byla tak drah\u00e1, \u017ee by si ji nikdo nekoupil<\/em>), by ne\u0161kodilo v testu trochu v\u00edc transparentnosti<\/strong>. Samoz\u0159ejm\u011b, to \u017ee pneumatiky nemaj\u00ed DOT k\u00f3dy automaticky neznamen\u00e1, \u017ee Tomket dodal k testov\u00e1n\u00ed vylep\u0161en\u00e9 sady, ale byl bych r\u00e1d, kdyby to v\u00fdrobce vysv\u011btlil a uvedl DOT k\u00f3dy na pravou m\u00edru <\/strong>a vylou\u010dil tak spekulace. Bez toho, aby spole\u010dnost uvedla m\u00edsto, kde se pneumatiky vyr\u00e1b\u00ed<\/strong>, jej m\u016f\u017ee kdykoliv zm\u011bnit a v\u00fdsledky dosavadn\u00edch test\u016f jsou tak prakticky bezp\u0159edm\u011btn\u00e9. Zkusil jsem se na DOT k\u00f3dy zeptat na Facebooku<\/a>, bohu\u017eel ale bez odpov\u011bdi. Celkov\u011b jsou Tomkety relativn\u011b tajemn\u00e9 – nev\u00ed se, kdo je vyr\u00e1b\u00ed, jedin\u00e9, co se (v r\u00e1diu<\/em>) dozv\u00edme, je, \u017ee se na nich dob\u0159e jezd\u00ed Honzovi z Prahy.<\/p>\n

A to je asi ten nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00ed probl\u00e9m, kter\u00fd s Tomkety m\u00e1m. Marketingov\u011b je to zvl\u00e1dnut\u00e9 skv\u011ble, nicm\u00e9n\u011b hodnocen\u00ed z\u00e1kazn\u00edk\u016f i z\u00e1kaznick\u00e1 podpora<\/strong> je pon\u011bkud rozpa\u010dit\u00e1. A pokud se v\u00e1m Tomkety nel\u00edb\u00ed, majitel spole\u010dnosti Radek Grill v\u00e1s bez serv\u00edtek nazve smyslu zbaven\u00fdm \u0161\u00edlencem<\/em>, odvol\u00e1v\u00e1 se na neexistuj\u00edc\u00ed testy pneumatik<\/strong> a z\u00e1ruku vr\u00e1cen\u00ed i ojet\u00fdch pneumatik<\/strong>, i kdy\u017e v podm\u00ednk\u00e1ch <\/a>stoj\u00ed, \u017ee “maxim\u00e1ln\u00ed \u00fabytek dez\u00e9nu mus\u00ed b\u00fdt do 0,5 mm oproti nov\u00e9 pneumatice”<\/em> a vr\u00e1tit lze “pouze do 14 dn\u00ed<\/em>“. A t\u011bch kontroverzn\u00edch koment\u00e1\u0159\u016f bez jak\u00e9koliv pokory k z\u00e1kazn\u00edkovi od pana Grilla najdeme na Facebooku v\u00edce:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

A n\u011bkter\u00e9 pak z\u016fstanou zcela bez reakce:\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

I na Heur\u00e9ce, kde jsou ve\u0161ker\u00e9 hodnocen\u00ed pneumatik v\u011bt\u0161inou pozitivn\u00ed, jsou n\u011bkter\u00e9 ohlasy celkem skeptick\u00e9:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Obr\u00e1zek si jist\u011b ud\u011bl\u00e1 ka\u017ed\u00fd s\u00e1m, nicm\u00e9n\u011b cel\u00e1 zna\u010dka by byla o dost sympati\u010dt\u011bj\u0161\u00ed, kdyby k masivn\u00ed reklamn\u00ed kampani bez objektivn\u00edch informac\u00ed p\u0159idala i transparentn\u00ed informace o v\u00fdrob\u011b t\u011bchto pneumatik (v recenzi<\/a> jsme se dop\u00e1trali, \u017ee zimn\u00ed vyr\u00e1b\u00ed spole\u010dnost Giti), slu\u0161nou z\u00e1kaznickou podporu a t\u0159eba i v\u011bnovala \u00fasil\u00ed i tomu, aby jej otestovala n\u011bkter\u00e1 z organizac\u00ed, kter\u00e1 testy pneumatik zve\u0159ej\u0148uje pravideln\u011b.<\/p>\n

Test 2018:<\/strong> To se ostatn\u011b tak\u00e9 u\u017e stalo, a tak si Tomket odnesl 33. m\u00edsto z 50 z\u00fa\u010dastn\u011bn\u00fdch v testu brzdn\u00e9 dr\u00e1hy Autobild<\/a> – p\u0159ed n\u00edm se um\u00edstily i pneumatiky zna\u010dek Goodride, Aoteli, Westlake, Imperial nebo Lassa, o \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9m srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s pr\u00e9miov\u00fdmi pneumatikami tedy nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt \u0159e\u010d – i Barum Polaris 3 na mokru zabrzd\u00ed o 3.5 metru d\u0159\u00edve.<\/p>\n

Test 2020:\u00a0<\/strong>I letos Autobild otestoval Tomket Snowroad Pro 3<\/a> a nedopadl nijak l\u00e9pe – 38. m\u00edsto z 50 a o 9 metr\u016f del\u0161\u00ed brzdn\u00e1 dr\u00e1ha oproti v\u00edt\u011bzi testu nen\u00ed nijak lichotiv\u00e1.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Spole\u010dnost Nejlevn\u011bj\u0161\u00edpneu.cz si nechala vytvo\u0159it nez\u00e1visl\u00fd test pneumatik Tomket ve dvou rozm\u011brech (205\/55 R16 a 225\/45 R17) od spole\u010dnosti IDIADA, kter\u00e1 se testov\u00e1n\u00edm dlouhodob\u011b zab\u00fdv\u00e1. Na tom v z\u00e1sad\u011b nen\u00ed nic \u0161patn\u00e9ho, p\u0159eci jen je to lok\u00e1ln\u00ed produkt (i kdy\u017e ho nejlevn\u011bj\u0161\u00edpneu prod\u00e1vaj\u00ed i na dal\u0161\u00edch v\u00fdchodn\u00edch trz\u00edch) a \u0161anci dostat se do renomovan\u00fdch test\u016f […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":634,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[147,158,166,172],"class_list":["post-683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-pneucyklopedie","tag-recenze","tag-snowroad","tag-test","tag-tomket"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/683","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=683"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/683\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":859,"href":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/683\/revisions\/859"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testpnevmatik.si\/mag\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}